header-logo header-logo

Disclosure pilots to drive wholesale cultural change

03 November 2017
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Legal News , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Significant reforms to the rules on disclosure are to be piloted next year, following concerns the current regime is unmanageable.

Significant reforms to the rules on disclosure are to be piloted next year, following concerns the current regime is unmanageable.

A working group chaired by Lady Justice Gloster, Vice President of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, launched proposals this week for a two-year pilot scheme, in the form of a Practice Direction, in the Business and Property Courts in the Rolls Building and in the centres of Bristol, Cardiff, Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle and Liverpool.

The working group was unanimous in its view that ‘wholesale cultural change’ is necessary, with completely new rules and guidelines on disclosure required.

It found that the system is geared towards paper rather than electronic documents. The volume of date has increased to often unmanageable proportions since the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) came into force 18 years ago. Searches are often too wide and disclosure insufficiently focused, resulting in vast quantities of unnecessary data. Disputing parties often fail to discuss disclosure properly before the first claims management conference (CMC).

Moreover, although the Jackson reforms set out a broad menu of disclosure options, neither the profession nor the judiciary have made full use of these. Consequently, standard disclosure remains the default.

Sir Terence Etherton, Master of the Rolls, said: ‘It is imperative that our disclosure system is, and is seen to be, highly efficient and flexible, reflecting developments in technology.’

Under the proposals, there would be no automatic entitlement to search based disclosure and the court would only make an order for what is to be termed ‘extended disclosure’ if there has been full engagement between the parties before the CMC. What has been termed ‘standard disclosure’ would disappear. There would be sanctions for non-compliance.

Ed Crosse, president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and partner at Simmons & Simmons, who helped draft the new rule, said: ‘Disclosure is one of the key benefits of litigating in London, and creating a world class civil disputes regime is critical to maintaining the Capital’s pre-eminence, particularly with Brexit fast-approaching and other centres competing to steal that crown.’

Businesses now store huge amounts of information electronically, which has a knock-on effect on disclosure when disputes go to court. In July, 72% of litigation practitioners surveyed by NLJ and the LSLA declared the current disclosure regime ‘not fit for purpose’.

The pilot will commence next year, subject to review and approval by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee in March/April 2018. The consultation on the draft Practice Direction closes on 28 February 2018.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll