header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011 / Steven O'Sullivan
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Disclosure or discretion?

How closely should solicitors guard a purchaser’s file from the lender? Steven O’Sullivan reports

Recession and falling property prices bring repossessions, even with historically low interest rates. Lenders who sell property at a loss inevitably look to see if there is any way to recoup those losses. The buyer’s solicitor (who normally acts for the lender too), with compulsory professional indemnity insurance, is an obvious target. The first step is to request the solicitor’s file. How should a solicitor respond to such a request? Should the file be handed over lock, stock and barrel?

The default position is that, absent the borrower’s consent or prima facie evidence of borrower fraud, the solicitor should not disclose the parts of the file that are privileged and/or confidential to the borrower. See para 8(c) of the SRA’s Guidance to rule 4 of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 and Nationwide BS v Various Solicitors [1999] PNLR52, per Blackburne J who held that “it was the lawyer’s duty to claim privilege on behalf of the client or former client whose privilege it is, at any rate where it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll