header-logo header-logo

Disclosure in the digital age

223028
Neil Swift, Fred Kelly & Zainab Bhadelia analyse the key findings of Jonathan Fisher KC’s independent review
  • In ‘Disclosure in the Digital Age: Independent Review of Disclosure and Fraud Offences’, Jonathan Fisher KC concludes that the structure of the disclosure regime is sound, and that the ‘keys to the warehouse’ approach ought to be rejected.
  • The government urgently needs to invest in training and resourcing so the system remains fit for purpose.

On 20 March 2025, Jonathan Fisher KC published Part 1 of the findings of his independent review of disclosure and fraud offences (the report), following the release of his preliminary findings in April 2024.

In the wake of recent high-profile disclosure failings which led to the collapse of several Serious Fraud Office (SFO) prosecutions, there were concerns about whether the current disclosure regime remained fit for purpose in a digital age, when complex cases often involve large volumes of data. As part of his wide-reaching review, Mr Fisher KC considered the appropriateness of both the ‘relevance test’ under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll