header-logo header-logo

11 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Disclosure

Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd; Rowland v Mitchell [2014] All ER (D) 273 (Mar)

It was settled law that those who made statements to the police, or gave information as witnesses, might do so in circumstances where an equitable obligation of confidence was owed to them. Where that was the case, there were two competing public interests to be balanced: (i) on the one hand the public interest of maintaining the confidentiality of those who made statements to the police in the course of a criminal investigation; and (ii) on the other hand, the public interest of ensuring that as far as possible the courts tried civil claims on the basis of all the relevant material and thus had the best prospect of reaching a fair result. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll