header-logo header-logo

Disarming litigation terrorists

John Fordham explains how devastating freezing injunctions can be

The world of litigation was, for a short period, in grave danger. Its most powerful weapon, the worldwide freezing (Mareva) injunction, had fallen into the wrong hands.

To English litigation lawyers, a worldwide freezing injunction is known as the nuclear weapon in the litigation armoury. Only English and a few like-minded courts have the jurisdiction to grant these very powerful orders. Courts on the continent of Europe do not, neither do courts in the US.

A Denning Creation

The weapon was first fashioned by one of the greatest English judges of the second half of the last century, Lord Denning. One of his relevant decisions concerned a ship called the Mareva which gave its name to Lord Denning's piece of litigation hardware. Commonwealth countries and others followed suit. Subsequently, it was given a statutory basis. Most recently, and regrettably, there has been an attempt to abolish the Mareva name in favour of the allegedly more plain English “freezing injunction”. But, Mareva has stuck (see The Mareva [1980]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll