header-logo header-logo

11 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Disability discrimination

R (on the application of Coleman) v Barnet London Borough Council [2012] EWHC 3725 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 256 (Dec)

The duty under s 149 of the Equality Act 2010 was not a duty to achieve a result, but to have due regard to the need to achieve the statutory goals. The court had to consider whether due regard had been paid to the equality duty and not simply whether the failure to have due regard to that duty was Wednesbury unreasonable. “Due” regard meant the regard that was appropriate in all the circumstances. The circumstances included the importance of the areas of life of the members of the disadvantaged group that were affected by the inequality of opportunity and the extent of the inequality, and such countervailing factors as were relevant to the function which the decision-maker was performing. Where disabilities were concerned, the duty encompassed due regard being given to the need to take steps to gather relevant information in order that the authority could properly take steps to take into account disabled persons’ disabilities in the context of the function under consideration. Performance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll