header-logo header-logo

Digital justice for all

226810
Professors Sue Prince & Liz Smart explain why inclusion must be at the heart of reform to improve access to justice
  • As digital technology replaces paper-based court processes, it is important to consider development from the perspective of those who use the courts, and to change the language from digital disadvantage to digital inclusion.

The Law Society reports that between 2010 and 2019, almost half the courts in England and Wales were closed. Those that remain have faced significant resourcing challenges, such as reducing judicial sitting hours and the opening hours of public counters.

In response to some of these issues, in 2016, HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) began a £1.2bn court modernisation programme. This programme was supported by the senior judiciary in the document ‘Transforming Our Justice System’. Court modernisation expanded and developed digital court services, replacing some of the traditional, paper-based processes with online and digital, such as the development of the Online Civil Money Claims portal for many small claims under £10,000. Whilst these reforms aim to modernise the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll