header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008 / Roger Harris
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A different breed

Roger Harris reviews recent decisions relating to the Animals Act

Key Points
The Animals Act 1971

Section 2 of the Animals Act (AA 1971) places all animals into one of two categories: animals either belong to a dangerous species or they do not. In respect of animals belonging to a dangerous species liability is strict. In respect of those which do not liability will only be strict if the provisions of AA 1971, s 2 are fulfilled.

These provisions are as follows:

        “(a)     the damage is of a kind which the animal, unless restrained, was likely to cause or which, if caused by the animal, was likely to be severe;

        (b)     the likelihood of the damage or of its being severe was due to characteristics of the animal which are not normally found in animals of the same species or are not normally so found except at particular times or in particular circumstances;

        (c)     those characteristics were known to that keeper …”

In addition s 5 provides that a party will not be strictly liable under s 2 either if the damage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll