header-logo header-logo

Diego Garcia 61 given right to come to UK

06 November 2024
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Tamil Sri Lankan asylum seekers currently being held on the island of Diego Garcia in the Chagos Archipelago are to be allowed to transfer to the UK, following legal proceedings

The 61 people, including 16 children, have spent more than three years on the island, a British territory governed by the British Indian Island Territory Administration (BIOTA). After being rescued from a leaky fishing boat by the Royal Navy, they were taken to the US military base island and have been living since in tents in a guarded compound.

The BIOT commissioner had decided the asylum seekers could be returned to Sri Lanka. However, ten of them brought a legal challenge in the BIOT supreme court, arguing the decision-making process was flawed, and claiming unlawful detention and habeas corpus. They were granted a judicial review, which was heard in September.

Judgment had been due this week. Instead, however, government legal representatives presented a letter to the court, stating: ‘Following further consideration of the position of the BIOT migrants, our clients have discussed a proposed change in policy by which all families, children and those of the unaccompanied males who do not have criminal convictions, outstanding charges or investigations would be offered the opportunity to be transferred directly to the UK.

‘Any such transfer would be subject to entry clearance applications being submitted… Work is ongoing this morning and it is expected that a decision on offering entry to the UK in this way will be reached in the next 48 hours.’

Tom Short, solicitor at Leigh Day, which is representing some of the claimants, said: ‘Our clients fled Sri Lanka seeking refuge from persecution.

‘The treatment and unlawful detention they have endured at the hands of the British Indian Ocean Territory Administration for the past three years is disgraceful. [This] decision is an enormous relief to our clients and we urge the Home Secretary to close the camp and bring our clients here without any further delay so that they can begin their recovery.’

In October, the government announced it would relinquish sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, including Diego Garcia—handing them to Mauritius.

Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll