header-logo header-logo

Detoxifying the workplace

125540
Positive workplace culture is fundamental to any law firm: Catrin Davies & Sophie Ruffles explain how the regulators are stepping in to stamp out bad behaviour
  • The Solicitors Regulation Authority has updated its Code of Conduct and guidance, making it clear that legal professionals must treat their colleagues fairly and with dignity.
  • It also puts the onus on managers to challenge behaviours that breach the code.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has turned its focus on promoting a positive workplace culture and stamping out ‘toxic’ behaviour, with new sections to the Code of Conduct which require fair treatment of colleagues, a requirement not to bully, harass or discriminate, and for managers to challenge behaviours that do not meet this standard. This is not the SRA taking on a more pastoral role for lawyers, but is to address poor client service that might arise due to poor workplace practices.

In May, the SRA also updated its guidance on the workplace environment to help firms and individuals understand what is required of them under the current rules, how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll