header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Deputy PM is right on

Courts must rise above human rights “paranoia” says Clegg

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has mounted a staunch defence of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and the decisions of the courts, ahead of the UK taking over the chairmanship of the Council of Europe in November.

Writing in The Guardian last week, Clegg said incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law had been “a hugely positive step”, reducing delays for litigants and sending a message about the value the UK places on human rights.

A future Bill of Rights should be used to “deepen our commitment” to the protections of HRA 1998 and to protect “other British liberties, such as the right to jury trial”. The government would use its chairmanship to seek reforms to “improve the timeliness and consistency” of the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision-making.

A myth had taken root that human rights were “a charter for greedy lawyers and meddlesome bureaucrats”, he wrote, blaming “overcautious lawyers and officials” for creating a “culture of legal paranoia”.

Clegg also listed some of the courts’ achievements, including preventing local authorities from snooping on families and upholding the rights of elderly married couples to be cared for together in care homes.

Prime Minister David Cameron has frequently called for HRA 1998 to be repealed, while MPs across the parties have expressed fury at a ECtHR ruling that Britain’s blanket ban on prisoners voting is unlawful.

Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti said: “This is a welcome intervention from the deputy prime minister and certainly not before time.

“The coalition was stitched together on a civil liberties ticket. You can’t talk human rights in the Arab spring whilst trashing them at home all year round.”

See further, the recent NLJ series on human rights by Roger Smith, director of Justice:

The State of Human Rights (1), (2), (3), (4)

Issue: 7479 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll