header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The deposit! Don't let this happen to your client

Alec Samuels provides some points of reference for trouble-free conveyancing

In the usual situation the deposit is paid by the purchaser P to the vendor V on the exchange of contracts, and the transaction runs smoothly. Complications may arise where, as a term of the contract, V (or P) has to obtain planning permission or V has to build the flat and make it ready for occupation. When the planning permission will be issued is uncertain until it happens; when the flat will be ready is uncertain until it happens. The deposit was to be paid 60 days after planning permission was obtained. Planning permission was obtained. V then served a five-day notice making time of the essence and requiring payment of the deposit. P did not pay.

The Court of Appeal held that as a matter of law the payment of the deposit is a condition of the contract, a fundamental term. The five-day notice was fair and reasonable, and made time of the essence. Failure by P to comply with the notice was a repudiation and breach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll