header-logo header-logo

10 May 2023
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety , Regulatory , National Health Service
printer mail-detail

Dentist cleared of mixing NHS & private work

A dentist did not breach regulations when she mixed NHS and private work on the same tooth, the Court of Appeal has held.

Lucy Williams provided three patients with a crown on the NHS and a ceramic crown for an additional private top-up fee of between £35 and £65. The professional conduct committee held the dentist acted in breach of regulations, was dishonest in so doing, and struck her off the register.

In General Dental Council v Williams [2023] EWCA Civ 481, however, the Court of Appeal held the NHS Contracts Regulations do not prevent dentists from charging a top-up fee to provide a better looking crown. Moreover, the court held the finding of dishonesty should never have been made.

Tania Francis, partner at Hempsons, which acted for Williams, said: ‘Of importance to the profession, the Court of Appeal found that these top-up fees are allowed by the regulations and indeed are much closer to the spirit of NHS dentistry than the [General Dental Council]’s interpretation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll