header-logo header-logo

10 May 2023
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety , Regulatory , National Health Service
printer mail-detail

Dentist cleared of mixing NHS & private work

A dentist did not breach regulations when she mixed NHS and private work on the same tooth, the Court of Appeal has held.

Lucy Williams provided three patients with a crown on the NHS and a ceramic crown for an additional private top-up fee of between £35 and £65. The professional conduct committee held the dentist acted in breach of regulations, was dishonest in so doing, and struck her off the register.

In General Dental Council v Williams [2023] EWCA Civ 481, however, the Court of Appeal held the NHS Contracts Regulations do not prevent dentists from charging a top-up fee to provide a better looking crown. Moreover, the court held the finding of dishonesty should never have been made.

Tania Francis, partner at Hempsons, which acted for Williams, said: ‘Of importance to the profession, the Court of Appeal found that these top-up fees are allowed by the regulations and indeed are much closer to the spirit of NHS dentistry than the [General Dental Council]’s interpretation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll