header-logo header-logo

15 November 2018 / Paul Hewitt , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Defining the United Kingdom

​Paul Hewitt reports on how to resolve mistakes & ambiguities in wills & the fallout from a geographical error

  • Mistakes and ambiguities in wills are common. Such issues can usually be resolved with a minimum of drama, but sometimes, court intervention is required .

Sometimes a will does not reflect what the testator intended. This could be because of a mistake in the drafting, a mistake in understanding instructions, or simply because the grammar or choice of words is confusing. These mistakes usually only come to light when it is too late for the testator to correct them, because he or she has passed away. It is left to the competing beneficiaries to then argue as to what was intended and, in the more intractable situations, ask a judge to determine.

There are two main ways to resolve an ambiguity or put right a mistake in a will: construction and rectification. The usual way to resolve ambiguity is through a ‘construction application’, which asks the court to decide what the words in the will mean. These invitations to the court can sometimes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll