header-logo header-logo

28 May 2009 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7371 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Defendants beware!

CFAs are on the rise in commercial litigation, says Nichola Evans

* * * * * *

Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs) were first introduced in the 1990s and the original objective was allow greater access to justice for those who either did not qualify for legal aid or were not wealthy enough to pursue litigation through the courts. Over the years the risk involved in litigation has passed to solicitors from clients and the Legal Services Commission.

Boom-time

The initial boom in the use of CFAs and after the event (ATE) insurance was in the personal injury sphere. Despite the fact that it was originally anticipated that they would be used in relation to other types of claims, CFAs backed by ATE insurance did not take off in commercial claims.

From 1 November 2005 a new regime came into place with the idea that unnecessary regulation would be taken away and courts should not be imposing draconian sanctions against solicitors where only a technical breach of the rules occurred. Cases decided since the new regulations were introduced have been generally supportive of this concept.

Press

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll