header-logo header-logo

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Defence solicitors will refuse ‘uneconomic’ cases

Criminal law solicitors joined their colleagues at the Bar this week by taking action in protest at low legal aid fees

Following a 95% vote in favour, London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) members are refusing to take on burglary instructions from 25 May. This is likely to result in magistrates’ court cases collapsing due to defendants being unable to access a lawyer.

Members may expand to other categories of ‘uneconomic’ cases in future, if demands are not met.

LCCSA president Hesham Puri said defence solicitors taking on low-paid cases like burglary ‘end up paying for the “privilege” to work. Our goodwill has run out.’

Puri said: ‘The public shouldn’t be fooled, there is no recovery plan for justice and the courts. There is no meaningful commitment to law and order.’

Meanwhile, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has said it may escalate its ‘no returns’ policy (https://bit.ly/3z1TxwD).

In a message to members this week, CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Over the last fortnight, we have received numerous emails and calls from criminal barristers at all levels of seniority expressing their dismay at the intransigence of government in the face of our concerted efforts to slow the progression of cases in the Crown Court.

‘The CBA has never ruled out an escalation of action if such a course is mandated by our membership. The recent feedback we have received from many members indicates a willingness and desire to adopt more disruptive forms of action in conjunction with the current strategy.’

Both solicitors and barristers want ministers to implement Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid chair, Sir Christopher Bellamy’s recommendations for an immediate increase of at least 15% in funding. In particular, the LCCSA is calling for a 25% increase in magistrates’ court fees and the CBA for a 25% increase in advocacy fees.

Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll