header-logo header-logo

01 October 2024
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Defence lawyers face dilemma on bids

Criminal defence solicitors have been left in the dark on rate rises while a shortage of family legal aid practitioners is forcing survivors of domestic abuse to represent themselves in court

Criminal defence firms are currently bidding for ten-year contracts due to start in October 2025, and have until 22 October to submit their applications to the Legal Aid Agency if they want to join a duty rota on the start date.

However, ministers have not yet published their response to the ‘Crime lower consultation’, which proposed reforms to the fee system for police station and youth court work. The consultation closed in March.

Neither has the Lord Chancellor outlined her response to the Law Society’s successful judicial review, R (on behalf of the Law Society) v Lord Chancellor [2024] EWHC 155 (Admin). The High Court held in January that former Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab acted irrationally and failed to make adequate enquiries when implementing Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review, which reported in 2021. Sir Christopher recommended an increase in defence solicitors’ legal aid rates of at least 15%.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘Both decisions are well overdue. How can firms make a sound business decision to bid for a new contract, especially one lasting ten years, without knowing whether these bare minimum criminal legal aid rate increases will ever happen?’

Emmerson also highlighted the impact on access to justice of solicitors leaving family and criminal legal aid due to the low fees, warning that 19% of legal aid firms have closed in the past five years.

The latest Family Court Statistics Quarterly, published last week, showed 1,555 survivors (29% of the total) made domestic abuse applications without legal representation between April and June. This is nearly double the number in 2011, when 15% were unrepresented.

Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll