header-logo header-logo

01 February 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Defamation—Order for costs—Approach

KC v MGN Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 3, [2013] All ER (D) 140 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Judge CJ, Lord Neuberger and Mr Justice Eady, 22 Jan 2013

If, following an appropriate apology, a claimant chooses to reject a clear and unequivocal offer of damages, and thus incurs additional legal expense himself, and requires the defendant to incur further expense, the burden of what proves to have been unnecessary legal expense should normally fall on the claimant.

James Dingemans QC and Julien Foster (instructed by YVA Solicitors) for the claimant. Desmond Browne QC and Yuli Takatsuki (instructed by MGN Legal Department) for the defendant.

The underlying proceedings involved an action in which the claimant argued that he had been libelled by an article in one of the defendant’s newspapers. The claimant obtained judgment and an order for damages and costs in his favour. The defendant then appealed successfully against the award of damages. The Court of Appeal reduced the judge’s starting point from £150,000 to £100,000. It left in place the 50% discount to allow for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll