header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Deciphering the code

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter examine the award of uplifts in employment tribunals

The Employment Act 2002 (EA 2002) introduced the prospect of an uplift or reduction percentage to awards in relevant claims to encourage compliance with the relevant procedure. Although the disciplinary and grievance procedures contained within that Act have since been repealed, the principle still remains albeit now contained within section 207A of the Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The “new” code, introduced in 2009, empowers the tribunal to adjust a relevant award by up to 25% if there has been an unreasonable failure to comply with the appropriate procedure.

Challenging terms

A recent research paper: Evaluation of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures (2011, Nilufer Rahim, Ashley Brown and Jenny Graham (NatCen)), based on in-depth interviews of 36 employers, employees and their representatives, noted that terms used within the code, such as “reasonable”, were considered challenging to implement consistently and for this reason, “doubts were expressed about the accessibility of the code to groups such as smaller employers”.

While the report

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll