header-logo header-logo

11 December 2008
Issue: 7349 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

A decade of CPR

Procedure

To mark the tenth anniversary of the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) next year, NLJ will be running a series of articles on their impact inside the courts and out.

Peter Thompson QC, general editor of Th e Civil Court Practice, says that in
his Final Report on Access to Justice, Lord Woolf criticised existing procedures for being too expensive, complicated and slow, and for producing an inequality of arms between rich litigants and poor.

“Lord Woolf recommended simpler, unifi ed rules, more court control, free advice for litigants in person and greater use of IT.

“After 10 years since the new rules came in we can say confidently that most litigants in person have benefited enormously from the reforms,” Thompson adds.

Issue: 7349 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll