header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008 / Julian Washington
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Wills & Probate , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Death and taxes

The Burden sisters could not have won their case without unravelling some of the fundamentals of the tax system, says Julian Washington

Sybil and Joyce Burden are aged 82 and 90 respectively. They are sisters, both unmarried, and live together in a family home near Marlborough, Wiltshire, which was built on a piece of land inherited from their parents. Every year since 1976 they have written to the chancellor of the exchequer before each budget about a tax problem and asked for the rules to be changed.

The essence of their problem is that, unlike in the case of spouses, where there is generally complete exemption from inheritance tax on the first death, no such exemption will be available when Joyce or Sybil dies. In all likelihood this will cause the survivor to have to sell the house in order to fund the tax bill. As for many people, the greatest part of their wealth is in bricks and mortar; they do not have enough liquid assets to pay the tax when the first of them dies.

Unfair Advantages?

The sisters' letters to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll