header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008 / Julian Washington
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Wills & Probate , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Death and taxes

The Burden sisters could not have won their case without unravelling some of the fundamentals of the tax system, says Julian Washington

Sybil and Joyce Burden are aged 82 and 90 respectively. They are sisters, both unmarried, and live together in a family home near Marlborough, Wiltshire, which was built on a piece of land inherited from their parents. Every year since 1976 they have written to the chancellor of the exchequer before each budget about a tax problem and asked for the rules to be changed.

The essence of their problem is that, unlike in the case of spouses, where there is generally complete exemption from inheritance tax on the first death, no such exemption will be available when Joyce or Sybil dies. In all likelihood this will cause the survivor to have to sell the house in order to fund the tax bill. As for many people, the greatest part of their wealth is in bricks and mortar; they do not have enough liquid assets to pay the tax when the first of them dies.

Unfair Advantages?

The sisters' letters to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll