header-logo header-logo

18 June 2021 / Alistair Spencer
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Burial disputes: Dead & buried?

51265
Alistair Spencer outlines the law underpinning & resolving burial disputes
  • Ownership of a body.
  • Ownership of ashes.
  • Intervention of the court in burial disputes.
  • Location of the burial.

The changing nature of society has led to disputes regarding funerals and the burial/cremation of bodies becoming more prevalent. The increase in second and third families, more dispersed families and more complex family relationships are some of the factors behind what appears to be an increase in disputes regarding bodies.

The death of a family member can bring out hidden rivalries and differing views as to the deceased’s wishes on a number of areas including funeral and burial arrangements, particularly if the deceased did not clearly set out their intentions.

Ownership of a body

When it comes to burial disputes the question of ownership of the deceased’s body often arises.

It was established in the case of R v Sharpe (1857) 21 JP 86 that the ‘law recognises no property in a corpse’. This was later cited in the more well-known case of Williams v Williams (1882)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll