header-logo header-logo

18 June 2021 / Alistair Spencer
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Burial disputes: Dead & buried?

51265
Alistair Spencer outlines the law underpinning & resolving burial disputes
  • Ownership of a body.
  • Ownership of ashes.
  • Intervention of the court in burial disputes.
  • Location of the burial.

The changing nature of society has led to disputes regarding funerals and the burial/cremation of bodies becoming more prevalent. The increase in second and third families, more dispersed families and more complex family relationships are some of the factors behind what appears to be an increase in disputes regarding bodies.

The death of a family member can bring out hidden rivalries and differing views as to the deceased’s wishes on a number of areas including funeral and burial arrangements, particularly if the deceased did not clearly set out their intentions.

Ownership of a body

When it comes to burial disputes the question of ownership of the deceased’s body often arises.

It was established in the case of R v Sharpe (1857) 21 JP 86 that the ‘law recognises no property in a corpse’. This was later cited in the more well-known case of Williams v Williams (1882)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll