header-logo header-logo

08 May 2026 / Daniel Bacon
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Dawn of the Renters’ Rights era

249003
© Getty images

Daniel Bacon hails the rental revolution, assesses pros and cons for both sides and predicts clogged-up tribunals

  • Describes private tenancy sector rights and responsibilities now the Renters’ Rights Act 2026 has come into force.
  • Succinctly sets out main points, including that assured shorthold tenancies and s 21 evictions no longer exist while the grounds for possession have broadened to include intention to sell with vacant possession and intention to move a family member into the property.

It is a brave new world in the private rental sector in England. As of 1 May 2026, the Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) is gone, there are no more fixed terms for tenancies under the Act, and s 21 is gone. And the tribunals are about to get a whole lot busier.

Possession

The new regime widens and liberalises the opportunities for landlords and lenders to recover possession. There is a new ground where the landlord intends to sell with vacant possession, and a liberalised ground for if a landlord or a family member wants to move into the property.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll