header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Charities , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Data obligations

nlj_7739_walsh

Charities must ensure that data is handled correctly, says Bethan Walsh

  • Charities must recognise the serious repercussions of mishandling customer data.

Following the recent fines issued to British Heart Foundation (BHF) and the RSPCA (£25,000 and £18,000 respectively) at the end of 2016, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has now notified a further 11 charities that it intends to fine them for breaching the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). The charities were investigated by the ICO as part of a wider operation following media reports about significant pressure placed on supporters to contribute to charities.

BHF and RSPCA fell foul of the DPA 1998 in relation to:

  • data sharing through a donor data swapping scheme called Reciprocate;
  • wealth screening; and
  • data-matching (telephone matching).

These practices were found to be in breach of the first principle of DPA 1998, which states that any personal data must be processed fairly and lawfully. The ICO’s decision was mainly based on the fact that BHF and the RSPCA had not sufficiently informed their supporters that their data would be shared and subject to wealth screening and data-matching.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll