header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Charities , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Data obligations

nlj_7739_walsh

Charities must ensure that data is handled correctly, says Bethan Walsh

  • Charities must recognise the serious repercussions of mishandling customer data.

Following the recent fines issued to British Heart Foundation (BHF) and the RSPCA (£25,000 and £18,000 respectively) at the end of 2016, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has now notified a further 11 charities that it intends to fine them for breaching the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). The charities were investigated by the ICO as part of a wider operation following media reports about significant pressure placed on supporters to contribute to charities.

BHF and RSPCA fell foul of the DPA 1998 in relation to:

  • data sharing through a donor data swapping scheme called Reciprocate;
  • wealth screening; and
  • data-matching (telephone matching).

These practices were found to be in breach of the first principle of DPA 1998, which states that any personal data must be processed fairly and lawfully. The ICO’s decision was mainly based on the fact that BHF and the RSPCA had not sufficiently informed their supporters that their data would be shared and subject to wealth screening and data-matching.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll