header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Data leak wake-up call

Supermarket vicariously liable for employee breach

Supermarket giant WM Morrison has lost its appeal against a ruling that it is liable for an intentional data breach by an employee, in the first class action data breach case.

In 2014, the supermarket’s disgruntled internal auditor, Andrew Skelton, posted bank account details, salary information, national insurance numbers, addresses and phone numbers of 100,000 employees to data sharing websites. Skelton was sentenced to eight years in prison and Morrison was held vicariously liable for his actions.

Ruling in WM Morrison Supermarkets v Various claimants [2018] EWCA Civ 2339, the Court of Appeal unanimously held the supermarket giant liable to the 5,518 claimants who sought compensation. Morrisons has been refused permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Nick McAleenan, partner at JMW Solicitors, who represented the claimants, said: ‘They were obliged to hand over sensitive personal information and had every right to expect it to remain confidential, but a copy was made and it was uploaded to the internet and they were put at risk of fraud, identity theft and a host of other problems. ‘Unsurprisingly, this caused a huge amount of worry, stress and inconvenience. The judgment is a wake-up call for business.’

Nicola Cain, partner at RPC, said: ‘The Court of Appeal’s decision in the Morrisons case is a stark warning to all businesses that they can end up facing huge data breach compensation claims despite doing nothing wrong at all.

‘The High Court specifically made the point that Morrisons met its legal obligations to protect its employees’ personal data. It was as much a victim in this case as those who had their data breached.’

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll