header-logo header-logo

27 September 2007
Issue: 7290 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Dangers of two-tier patent system

News

Plans to fast-track patent applications could encourage an unfair, two-tier system, intellectual property (IP) experts claim.

Their comments follow the launch of a public consultation on proposals to introduce fast-track processing services for patent and trade mark applications. The consultation is being led by the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) and takes forward proposals made in the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property.

Osborne Clarke’s head of IP, Theo Savvides, says any steps towards a more efficient system are welcome, but he has reservations about the proposals.
“The UK-IPO is already a very efficient (and good value) registry. Applicants can often expect to obtain a trade mark registration in just six months, should no objections or oppositions be encountered.

“I would not necessarily advise a client to spend an extra £300 in fees (and doubtless an extra set of trade mark attorney’s fees) to fast-track their application that, in reality, would only speed matters up by a few weeks.”
A fast-track system is already in place for patent applications at no extra cost to applicants, but it has not been particularly successful, he says.

“I would query whether by introducing a fee-based fast-track system we would be condoning a two-tier patent regime. After all, damages for infringement are only recoverable from the date of publication, meaning that a larger, corporate patentee with more money to spend would potentially be recovering damages quicker than an individual or start-up.”

Savvides believes this could discriminate against individuals and small- and medium-sized enterprises, which are the kind of applicants the UK-IPO should be encouraging to use its services.

“I would also like to see the UK-IPO providing an assurance that that ‘standard track’ will not, in time, turn into the ‘slow-track’ as fast-track patents could conceivably push standard applications further and further to the bottom of the pile,” he adds.

The consultation is at www.ipo.gov.uk and runs until 14 December 2007.

 

Issue: 7290 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll