header-logo header-logo

31 January 2014
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Damages—Assessment of damages—Fatal accidents

Haxton v Philips Electronics UK Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 4, [2014] All ER (D) 138 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Elias, Beatson LJJ and Dame Janet Smith, 22 Jan 2014

There is no reason of principle or policy which should deprive a claimant from recovering damages representing the loss she has suffered as a result of the curtailment of her life by the negligent action of the defendant, where she has brought other proceedings against the defendant and the damages in those proceedings were lower because of her life expectancy being reduced by the defendant’s negligence.

Robert Weir QC and Harry Steinberg (instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP) for the claimant. Catherine Foster (instructed by Wragge & Co LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant and her husband both developed mesothelioma as a result of the husband’s exposure to asbestos dust during the course of his employment with the defendant company. The husband developed symptoms in 2008 and died the following year. The claimant issued two sets of proceedings against the defendant. The first claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll