header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Damages

Safeway Stores Ltd and others v Twigger and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1472, [2010] All ER (D) 245 (Dec)

If an undertaking infringed provisions of the Competition Act 1998 relating to anti-competitive activity and was duly penalised by the OFT, that undertaking could not recover the amount of such penalties from its directors or employees who were themselves responsible for the infringement. The liability was personal to the undertaking. No one was liable for the penalty imposed by the Act except the relevant undertaking.

If there was a liability it could not be imposed on any person other than the undertaking and the undertaking was personally liable for the infringement. If a penalty was imposed, it would only be because the undertaking itself had intentionally or negligently committed the infringement.

In those circumstances, it was the undertaking which was personally at fault (there could be no one else who was) and, once the maxim was engaged, the undertaking could not say that it was not personally at fault in order to defeat the application of the maxim. The whole hypothesis of the undertaking’s liability was that it was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll