header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Damages

Safeway Stores Ltd and others v Twigger and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1472, [2010] All ER (D) 245 (Dec)

If an undertaking infringed provisions of the Competition Act 1998 relating to anti-competitive activity and was duly penalised by the OFT, that undertaking could not recover the amount of such penalties from its directors or employees who were themselves responsible for the infringement. The liability was personal to the undertaking. No one was liable for the penalty imposed by the Act except the relevant undertaking.

If there was a liability it could not be imposed on any person other than the undertaking and the undertaking was personally liable for the infringement. If a penalty was imposed, it would only be because the undertaking itself had intentionally or negligently committed the infringement.

In those circumstances, it was the undertaking which was personally at fault (there could be no one else who was) and, once the maxim was engaged, the undertaking could not say that it was not personally at fault in order to defeat the application of the maxim. The whole hypothesis of the undertaking’s liability was that it was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll