header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Richard Lawson
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Damage limitation

Richard Lawson considers the limits of recovery for damages for breach of contract

In Wiseman v Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd [2006] EWHC 1566 (QB), [2006] All ER (D) 344 (Jun) Dr Raphael Wiseman sought compensation for extra hotel accommodation and related expenses after being wrongly turned away from his flight from Nigeria to London. The High Court accepted that the action was subject to the contemplation formula laid down in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 23 LJ Ex 179, [1843-60] All ER Rep 461. The relevant costs were allowed in Wiseman, precedent being provided by Hamlin v Great Northern Rly Co (1856) 1 H & N 408, 26 LJ Ex 20 and Woodger v Great Western Rly Co (1867) LR 2 CP 318, 36 LJCP 177.

Alternative transport

It is not entirely clear that a claim for hiring alternative transport would be unsupported in principle. In Le Blanche v London and North Western Rly Co (1876) 1 CPD 286, 40 JP 580 a passenger found that his connection had left. He hired a special train which arrived earlier than the train he could otherwise have caught. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll