header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Hayley Mclorinan
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Damage control

Hayley McLorinan tackles the issue of recoverable heads of loss between jurisdictions

Can an English court assess damages using the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) when the tortious act resulting in death occurred in Germany? No, said the Court of Appeal in Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854, [2012] All ER (D) 168 (Jun), Dame Janet Smith dissenting.

The facts

Mrs Cox lived in Germany with her husband, Major Christopher Cox, where he was stationed with HM Forces. They were both UK nationals. In May 2004, Major Cox was killed while riding his bicycle when he was hit by a car. The car driver was a German national with a German registered insurance company. Mrs Cox returned to the UK in 2005.

It was not disputed that liability fell to be determined under German law, or that the matter could be heard in England. The dispute arose as to whether damages could be awarded to Mrs Cox under the English FAA 1976, which affords dependants the ability to claim for dependency. A claim under English law was potentially more valuable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll