header-logo header-logo

03 November 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Cutting it

Dominic Regan returns to the consequences of the referral fee chop

My recent article about this topic provoked more interest than anything I have ever written. I return to the topic for much has happened since the government announced that it was going to ban the payment of referral fees.

Meanwhile, in a fiery talk delivered last month, Jack Straw stated that the claims management companies which thrive on the lucrative income generated by the commoditisation of claims would not be allowed to circumvent the law.

Self-referral

One possibility I anticipated in my earlier article has seemingly already happened. I understand that some claims companies have decided to buy into law firms and so maintain their income by referring the cases acquired to itself.

There has also been a remarkable change of nomenclature, with several bodies that were receiving referral fees now saying that it is a marketing or advertising fee instead. Those companies, such as Injury Lawyers 4U, which advertises and then allocates work to its solicitor members, will thrive. Straw

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll