header-logo header-logo

08 December 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Cutting back?

Dominic Regan examines the possibilities of reducing expert costs after Jackson

Litigation is too expensive. No part of the process is sacrosanct and it is clear that, for a variety of reasons, those who provide expert evidence for civil litigation are going to be squeezed.

I was staggered to be told by the eminent senior junior, Simon Butler, that in many a case his fees for the entire litigation are as nothing compared to what the experts charge. This is a man who takes on the most challenging legal issues. What has gone wrong?

Capping costs

Twelve years ago the CPR arrived and within Pt 35 there is the express power to cap the costs of an expert that can be recovered from the paying party. Do you know of a case where this has happened? I do not.

Litigators must shoulder responsibility too. The most senior designated civil judge in the country told me of his utter despair when asked to assess costs. Time after time, there would be a stink

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll