header-logo header-logo

01 May 2024
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , ADR
printer mail-detail

Cruise claim couple urged to settle

Three Court of Appeal judges have urged a couple whose cruise in Arctic Canada was diverted due to icy conditions to ‘reach a pragmatic settlement’ rather than continue through the courts

Rosemary and Nicholas Sherman, who are representing themselves, booked a cruise to the Northwest Passage with travel company Reader Offers Ltd (ROL). They brought a claim for a refund and compensation after their ship missed the majority of advertised destinations, instead exploring the west coast of Greenland.

Handing down judgment last week in Sherman and another v Reader Offers Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 412, however, Lord Justice Males warned the couple that any compensation was likely to be ‘modest’.

Commenting on the proportionality of the case, he said: ‘I am concerned that a claim about a cruise in which nobody died or was injured or suffered any lasting damage has now occupied seven days in the County Court, two days in the High Court and a further two days in the Court of Appeal, and that a yet further hearing will be required before it can be concluded.

‘It is not for us to apportion responsibility for this… I would note, however, that the court has done what it could to help the parties to resolve this dispute without this time-consuming and expensive litigation.

‘As early as 18 February 2020, Deputy District Judge Loughbridge made an order that “At all stages the parties must consider settling this litigation by any means of Alternative Dispute Resolution (including Mediation)”.

‘Such orders are now increasingly common and must be taken seriously… we urged the parties to reach a pragmatic settlement so that they can put this case behind them… I would repeat that urging. Even now it is not too late.’

Both Lady Justice Asplin and Lord Justice Underhill also urged the parties to reach a pragmatic settlement.

Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll