header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Crossing the line

Could UK strike laws be in breach of international obligations, asks Chris Syder

Membership of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), a Geneva-based United Nations body that promotes social justice, obliges the UK to respect freedom of association. Respect for freedom of association is also a legal obligation for those governments that ratify ILO labour standards incorporating freedom of association. The best known ILO labour standard concerning freedom of association is Convention 87. The UK ratified Convention 87 in June 1949 and, in so doing, is obliged to ensure that its national labour laws and practices comply with the terms of the Convention.

“Right to strike” dispute

In recent years, the national employer organisations and national trade unions participating in the ILO have disagreed about whether the “right to strike” and its modalities form part of Convention 87’s freedom of association obligations. If they do, then they form part of the UK’s freedom of association obligations flowing from its ratification of Convention 87. Herein lies a problem because the UK’s current strike laws do not conform to these modalities—not least because of the ban on sympathy strikes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll