header-logo header-logo

13 June 2014 / David Short
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Crossing the line

David Short examines the possibility of the relatives of mesothelioma victims making claims north of the border

Many of the victims of asbestos induced mesothelioma in England and Wales spent part of their working life in Scotland. Shipyard workers from the north east of England appear to have regularly worked in the shipyards in Glasgow. In doing so they would have suffered exposure to asbestos in the Glasgow yards.

If there was material negligent exposure to asbestos in Scotland, and there has been a concluded litigation in England or Wales by the primary victim and spouse, it is possible for the extended family to raise a second action in Scotland for damages within three years (there are proposals contained in the Court Reform Bill to extend this period to five years) from the death of the primary victim.

Prior to 2006, if a primary victim had settled his or her case during life, the relatives entitled to damages for the death were barred from claiming.

In mesothelioma cases, where diagnosis inevitably means death within a fairly short period of time, this forced a dying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll