header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-detail

Cross-border debt

In brief

The European Commission wants to make it easier to recover cross-border debts within the EU. The commission says the current disparity in enforcement laws in member states means efforts to collect cross-border debts are often hampered, with creditors
incurring greater costs and facing delays due to differences in legal systems, procedural requirements and language barriers. Instead the commission is proposing the introduction of a European order for the attachment of bank accounts. This would allow creditors to secure a sum of money due to or claimed by them, by preventing the removal or transfer of funds held to the credit of their debtor in one or several bank accounts within the territory of the EU. The consultation, A Green Paper on Improving the Efficiency of the Enforcement of Judgments in the European Union: The Attachment of Bank Accounts, runs until 31 March 2007.

Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll