header-logo header-logo

20 April 2010
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

Remice v Governor of Belmarsh [2007] All ER (D) 439 (Mar)

The defendant was granted conditional bail.  The prosecution appealed to the Crown Court.  The judge refused bail and remanded the defendant in custody but did not set a return date for the defendant to appear again before the magistrates’ court. 

Held:  although ss 128 and 128A of the 1980 Act do not directly bind the Crown Court, a defendant should enjoy no lesser rights than he would have done had the prosecutor’s appeal not supervened. 

In the instant case, the Crown Court ought to have deployed the provisions of s 128A(2) and considered whether the claimant should have been remanded for more than eight days. If question was decided in the affirmative, he should have been allowed to make representations.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll