header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

R (Gillan) v DPP [2007] EWHC 380, [2007] All ER (D) 185 (Feb)

(a) applications for judicial review of interlocutory rulings by crown court judges where the decision is not one involving trial on indictment should be relatively rare and exceptional;

(b) a crown court judge has jurisdiction to allow a fresh Newton hearing to take place (even though one took place in the magistrates’ court before the defendant was committed for sentence) if satisfied that it is in the interests of fairness and justice to do so. 

However, the judge should not ordinarily allow a defendant to re-open findings of fact determined by a magistrates’ court unless the defendant can point to some significant development or matter, such as important further evidence discovered since the magistrates’ court reached its conclusion on the facts.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll