header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R v H (Interlocutory application: Disclosure) [2007] UKHL 7, [2007] All ER (D) 377 (Feb)

A judge who is considering whether to hold a preparatory hearing under the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA 1987), s 7 has only to decide whether a substantial benefit, for one of the purposes listed under sub-s (1), would arise from determining the relevant issues at a preparatory hearing, rather than after a jury had been empanelled.

The judge may determine other interlocutory applications at the same time as the preparatory hearing, but there is no appeal to the Court of Appeal, under CJA 1987, s 9(11), unless the matter for determination falls within s 9(3). It follows that an order in determination of an application for disclosure under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s 8 would qualify for an appeal under CJA 1987, s 9(11) if it involves the determination of a question of law relating to the case.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll