header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers take action

Criminal legal aid solicitors across England and Wales were divided on whether to take direct action this week over new contract terms.

Solicitors at meetings in London, Merseyside and Manchester voted unanimously in favour of direct action, agreeing not to accept legal aid work under the new contracts, which were due to begin on 1 July. Solicitors at meetings in Cardiff, Birmingham and East Yorkshire have also backed the action.

The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) meeting described the levels of funding about to be introduced as “untenable” and the new two-tier contract scheme “ill-conceived” as it risked “irreparable and unconscionable damage to the criminal justice system”.

However, solicitors in both Leicester and Teeside voted against direct action.

The new contracts impose a further 8.75% cut on solicitors’ fees for criminal legal aid work. Solicitors say it will be uneconomical for them to do the work to the required standard as they would be running at a loss.

LCCSA President Jon Black says: “We have overwhelming support for this action, which regrettably is necessary as a result of the government’s intention to implement cuts and the proposed further cuts amounting to over 50% on some cases for January 2016, without carrying out the promised meaningful review.

“We have drafted a protocol, and firms that seek to act in breach of this are letting themselves, their professional colleagues and their clients down.”

Independent barristers attending the London meeting expressed support and proposed re-introducing a no returns policy for all existing cases in the Crown Court from 1 July. Manchester’s Garden Court North has also announced its support and is adopting a policy of no returns from 1 July.

-

 
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll