header-logo header-logo

13 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers at risk

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has questioned why the courts are to spend time piloting COVID-19 testing at selected sites when such a scheme has already ‘been administered in car parks up and down the land for many months’

James Mulholland QC, in his Monday Message to members this week, said the CBA raised the issue of testing with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) before Christmas but have ‘just been informed that the Service is developing a limited pilot scheme in relation to lateral flow testing for all court users…We need testing brought in immediately. Testing kits should be on their way to all court centres now.’

He said there were problems with HMCTS’s attempts to track and trace court users, since not all barristers who tested positive for the virus had been contacted, and nor was HMCTS locating all those who had been in contact with those who had positive tests.

The CBA met with unions and representative bodies of professional court users last week to discuss ‘serious concerns’ about safety. Mulholland said: ‘A mass testing system needs an immediate, court-wide roll-out. We need a faster Covid vaccination programme for professional court users.’

He warned the new variant of the virus increased the risk of visits to poorly ventilated cell areas and trials where judges fail to take regular breaks. Various accounts, particularly from magistrates’ courts indicated the desire to push on with hearings was taking precedence over safety, he said, while ‘in the last few days alone, we are seeing professional court users continuing to test positive for the virus from Cardiff to Sheffield to Norwich’.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: ‘We continue to work with DHSC (Department for Health and Social Care) to understand whether rapid testing could be delivered in a court setting.’

 

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll