header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Criminal BVT proposals shelved

Legal news update

Plans to introduce best value tendering (BVT) for criminal defence services in October have been scrapped by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) following fierce opposition from stakeholders.

The LSC says it will sit down with service providers and representative bodies to revamp its BVT plans before it puts a new model out to consultation at the end of this year. The new-look scheme will also be piloted in a few selected areas before it is rolled out countrywide, the LSC confirms.

Carolyn Regan, LSC chief executive, says: “The LSC shares with its service providers the desire of greater certainty and greater stability. We have listened to them and have made a number of changes to our initial plans for BVT as a result. We are putting back the second consultation on BVT to December 2008 so that we have more time to work with providers and their representative bodies.

“Following the second consultation if BVT is adopted it will be piloted and then evaluated before deciding whether or not to go forward with it in other areas of England and Wales. The start date for tendering for any pilot has also been put back to July 2009 at the earliest.”

She adds: “The LSC believes that BVT has the potential to secure high quality criminal legal aid services, best value for taxpayers money and a fair deal for providers.”

The original BVT proposals were shelved after the initial consultation showed overwhelming opposition to the scheme with all the representative bodies who responded being against the initiative.

Law Society legal aid manager, Richard Miller, says: “Given the strength of opposition from legal aid practitioners, we are pleased that the LSC has acknowledged many of the problems posed by BVT and will now give careful consideration to the issues before any further steps to implement it are taken.”

He welcomes the LSC’s decision to pilot the scheme and carry out an evaluation before any national roll-out takes place.

Miller adds: “We hope the evaluation process will be objective and transparent, and that BVT will not proceed nationally if our concerns about it threatening the sustainability of legally aided criminal defence services are borne out.

“The LSC has accepted the need to work a more realistic timetable; the pilot means that should BVT ultimately be given the green light, legal aid providers will now have much more time to prepare for the tendering process.”

The LSC has also set out other developments it intends to make in criminal legal aid over the next year. These include consulting on introducing means testing in the Crown Court and consultation on Crown Court remuneration.

 

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll