header-logo header-logo

02 December 2020
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Criminal Bar ‘will take action’

Plans for extended operating hours may provoke strike action

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has hinted at potential strike action if the government presses ahead with extended operating hours.

An HM Courts & Tribunal Service (HMCTS) ‘Consultation with legal professionals on COVID operating hours in the Crown Courts’ ends on 10 December. Extended operating hours (with courts sitting 9am-1pm and 2pm-6pm) is currently being piloted in seven Crown Courts.

Extended operating hours were discussed last week at a meeting between the CBA, other legal professionals and HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS). CBA chair James Mulholland QC, in his message to members this week, said ‘we were, effectively, not being asked but being told that there were plans for Extended Operating Hours Courts to go ahead from January 2021’.

After setting out the CBA’s objections to the plan, Mulholland said: ‘In 2015 we took action, refusing returns, in solidarity with criminal legal aid solicitors…Cuts to criminal advocates’ legal aid fees and a failure to increase prosecution fees resulted in the Criminal Bar balloting for and taking action in 2018 and 2019…If HMCTS maintain their position that these courts will be introduced, we will take action.’

He said HMCTS has failed to conduct a proper assessment of the plan, in breach of the Equality Act 2010, adding: ‘The consultation process now initiated provides insufficient time for proper representations to be made.’

Mulholland warned extended operating hours would deter people from the criminal Bar, particularly women, citing a CBA survey three years ago showing it would have a ‘very significant discriminatory impact on those with young children and other caring responsibilities’. He said the Spending Review commitment of £275m last week should be used to expand the physical court space available.

The backlog of cases in Crown Courts has increased to 50,000 from about 40,000 in March, and will take years to clear, according to evidence given by the Lord Chief Justice to the Justice Committee. He predicted increasing numbers of cases coming through the courts, and said ‘even if we were able to run those courts flat out, we would be retrieving the backlog only a little, maybe by 50 cases a week or that sort’. 

Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll