header-logo header-logo

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Criminal bar considers offer in stand off with government

Criminal barristers have suspended their ‘no returns’ policy until 12 June, pending consideration of a conciliatory offer made by the Ministry of Justice.

The Criminal Bar has been refusing ‘returns’ work—where one advocate covers for another who has been delayed or called away—since 1 April in protest against changes to the Advocates Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) which would cut fee income.

A heads of chambers meeting was scheduled for this week to discuss the offer. In her weekly update, Angela Rafferty QC, Criminal Bar Chair, said barristers will be balloted following the meeting.

The offer on the table is an extra £15m investment, of which £8m will go to fraud, drug and high-page sex cases, £4.5m will be earmarked for junior fees, and there will be a 1% rise across all fees in April 2019. The scheme will be reviewed within 18 months.

Meanwhile, the Law Society is bringing a judicial review against cuts to the Litigators' Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS), which would reduce payments for prosecution evidence in Crown Court cases from 10,000 to 6,000 pages.

Law Society president Joe Egan said: ‘We’re pleased the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has recognised the argument that there needs to be proper funding in the criminal justice system, as evidenced by the proposed release of additional funds for legally aided work.

'We hope the MoJ will now withdraw their opposition to the Law Society’s judicial review for the LGFS cuts. We look forward to a similar announcement in relation to the work carried out by solicitors, including the withdrawal of the most recent pages of prosecution evidence cut.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll