header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 August 2022 / David Walbank KC
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crime brief: 12 August 2022

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
90408
David Walbank QC examines a tragic case which underlines the polycentric decision-making process for offences involving young persons
  • Victims’ Right to Review scheme.
  • Charging decisions involving young persons.

We live in an era when decision-making throughout the criminal justice system is ever more hedged about by guidelines, protocols, codes of practice and the like. Whether it be grounds for arrest, charging decisions, legal directions to the jury, sentencing parameters or Parole Board reviews, the exercise of discretion is constrained like never before. It is against that background that the Divisional Court recently struck a blow for common sense and compassion when it comes to the laying of serious criminal charges against young persons.

In R (on the application of Joseph) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2022] EWHC 131 (Admin), [2022] All ER (D) 96 (Jan), Popplewell LJ referred to what he called the ‘polycentric’ decision-making process when considering the possible criminal prosecution of a young person, and also explained the approach to be taken where there is a tension between different guidance documents issued by the Crown Prosecution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll