header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features , CPR
printer mail-detail

Crime Brief

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES

The Law Society has published a practice note detailing solicitors’ duties under the Criminal Procedure Rules (CrimPR). The purpose of the practice note is to provide assistance to the profession in seeking to define the extent of duties and burdens under the rules, and to identify and address the ethical problems that are likely to arise from their imposition. It examines the following: (i) the solicitor’s duty to the court; (ii) the solicitor, the client and the court, “a divided loyalty”; (iii) the CrimPR; and (iv) the approach of the court towards solicitors under CrimPR (see www.lawsociety.org.uk).

Rule amendments

The second amendment to the CrimPR 2005 was implemented on 1 October 2007. The following changes are made:
- A new Pt 65 (appeal to the Court of Appeal: general rules), in substitution for the existing Pt 65 (appeal to the Court of Appeal against ruling in preparatory hearing). The rules that relate to an appeal against a ruling in a preparatory hearing are found in the new Pt 66. The new Pt 65 provides rules of general application to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll