header-logo header-logo

13 March 2009 / Andrew Keogh
Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Crime Brief

Litigator Graduated Fees - A step by step guide

Litigator graduated fees (LGF) apply to all cases where the representation order is dated on or after 14 January 2008, and which do not fall within the very high cost case (VHCC) funding regime. So, if a case was in court on 10 January and adjourned for committal on 3 March and committed for trial, it would be billed under the old scheme (as the representation order dated 10 January covers crown court proceedings and is dated prior to 14 January). All fees in the 2007 funding order are expressed exclusive of VAT. Essentially, each case is “worth” a graduated fee. This depends on:

(i)                   the seriousness of case;

(ii)                 pages of evidence; and (iii) what happens—plea, cracked trial, or trial (there are other provisions dealing with transfers and various other outcomes such as hearings).

The magistrates’ court element of a case sent to the crown court (Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 51) is included in the LGF and does not attract any extra payment.

If a case proceeds to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll