header-logo header-logo

28 March 2014 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The creditors’ claims (3)

web_duncan

Simon Duncan continues to explore who has the right to sue former directors under s 15(1) of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

Section 15(1) of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) imposes personal liability for the relevant debts of the company on a disqualified director where he has been involved in the management of the company. However, s 15(1) is silent as to who may bring such a claim. The case law holds that such a right vests by statute in a creditor, not a liquidator see Re Prestige Grinding Limited [2005] EWHC 3076 (Ch), [2006] 1 BCLC 440 (and “The creditors’ claims” 162 NLJ 7530, p 1175).

Prestige is also authority for the proposition that the liquidator has a right to claim a contribution from the disqualified director where the general law allows. However, if the s 15(1) claim could be pursued by a liquidator, it is said this would set up a right of contribution from the disqualified director against the company in liquidation that would defeat the liquidator’s claim. This is because s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll