header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Cracking the meaning

79711390_4

Andrew Francis examines the risks involved in construing the wording of legal documents

Two recent authorities have demonstrated the risks encountered by clients, advisers and draftsmen when construing the words used in legal documents. In one case, the document containing the crucial words was, at the time of the judgment, just seven days past its 45th birthday. In the other case, the document in question was less than three years old at the time of the judgment at trial and just less than four years old at the time of the judgments delivered by the Court of Appeal.

Both demonstrate the wisdom shown by Humpty Dumpty in Alice Through the Looking-Glass where he said first: “When I use a word...it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” And where he then said: “The question is...which is to be master—that’s all.”

Two cases in search of an answer

In this article, the two cases below will show how the intention of the parties to documents and the principles of construction of the words used in them will depend

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll