header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 December 2013 / Ross Risby
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Cracking it

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_risby

Ross Risby highlights the value of selecting the best experts in professional negligence litigation
The expert evidence given at trial often plays a crucial role in determining the ultimate outcome of professional negligence litigation. Three recent cases act as reminders of the importance which needs to be placed on selection of the experts, if a party is to be given the best chance of success at trial.

 

Survey failings

In Igloo Regeneration (General Partner) Ltd v Powell William Partnership [2013] EWHC 1718 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 257 (Jun) the claimant had bought historic mill buildings in Leeds in 2003. Prior to the purchase, it engaged the defendant surveyors and engineers (PWP) to survey those buildings. PWP reported that cracking was visible in three brick piers and suggested that remedial ties should be installed, the situation monitored and £20,000 be retained for future remedial work.

Serious increases in crack size were subsequently recorded which were later accepted as being consistent with compression failure. Remedial works cost substantially more than the £20,000 PWP had suggested be set aside and proceedings were issued against PWP,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll